the rewritten big book - mixed messages about?

[Pluted Pup]

The same GSR who said the plain language version
of the big book would be a dual version with
side by side new and old versions, also read a portion
of the plain version, the first page of Bill's
story: it sounds dull compared to the original,
but I'd have to see it to see it.

But elsewhere we've been told that Bill's
story wouldn't be changed, so which story is
right?

Here's an idea, rather than distributing technical
information by word of mouth, how about
publishing it in the Grapevine. The present
form of changes are shady, where changes are
backdoor, and then informing the groups after
decisions are already made.

It's announced as being printed soon, so why the
secrets about it's contents? Is it a dual
version or not?

[banjo Jon]

Post by Pluted Pup
The same GSR who said the plain language version
of the big book would be a dual version with
side by side new and old versions, also read a portion
of the plain version, the first page of Bill's
story: it sounds dull compared to the original,
but I'd have to see it to see it.
But elsewhere we've been told that Bill's
story wouldn't be changed, so which story is
right?
Here's an idea, rather than distributing technical
information by word of mouth, how about
publishing it in the Grapevine. The present
form of changes are shady, where changes are
backdoor, and then informing the groups after
decisions are already made.
It's announced as being printed soon, so why the
secrets about it's contents? Is it a dual
version or not?

My sources say that the further up the echelon to the GSO, the more
corrupt AA gets. This appears to be just one of the results.