Discussion:
From our FAQ
(too old to reply)
Bob
2024-09-02 01:15:39 UTC
Permalink
9. Should A.A. Change?

Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.

Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
Sharx335
2024-09-02 03:02:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
There's TWO things that many alcoholics don't like: 1. Change and 2.
Staying the same.
Bob
2024-09-02 03:26:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
There's TWO things that many alcoholics don't like: 1. Change and 2.
Staying the same.
((- change} + (- staying the same} = Complacency) + We have to grow or
deteriorate = We are deteriorating?
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
badgolferman
2024-09-02 10:38:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
There's TWO things that many alcoholics don't like: 1. Change and 2.
Staying the same.
AA has changed! The singleness of purpose is dead. The Big Book has been
rewritten. Homosexuality is actively promoted. Service work and 12th Step
work are avoided.

Congratulations on “improving” AA…
Bob
2024-09-02 11:07:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by badgolferman
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
There's TWO things that many alcoholics don't like: 1. Change and 2.
Staying the same.
AA has changed! The singleness of purpose is dead. The Big Book has been
rewritten. Homosexuality is actively promoted. Service work and 12th Step
work are avoided.
Congratulations on “improving” AA…
If you're fair dinkum, and not farting through your mouth, now's your
chance!

From memory, there were about 100 araaers hangin around and sticking their
nose in when Ted H chaired the last FAQ summit.

Surely you could handle the handful left here to write them as they "should"
be written. Bloody hell, you could show those old time padres all is not
lost, and start the AA reformation (With Jon as HP - but that's tongue in
cheek) right here!
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
badgolferman
2024-09-02 14:16:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
From memory, there were about 100 araaers hangin around and sticking
their nose in when Ted H chaired the last FAQ summit.
We already did this about 4-5 years ago. I don't think you were here
then so it only took a few days rather than endless personal insults
from you extending the thread.
Bob
2024-09-02 14:51:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by badgolferman
Post by Bob
From memory, there were about 100 araaers hangin around and sticking
their nose in when Ted H chaired the last FAQ summit.
We already did this about 4-5 years ago. I don't think you were here
then so it only took a few days rather than endless personal insults
from you extending the thread.
Maybe because absolutely nothing in the FAQ was changed because you were
being your usual intransigent self, and everyone else gave up hope. ;-)

On my latest return here, expressing extreme guilt about that behaviour,
IIRC Ted H said words to the effect it didn't seem all that bad to him.
Given I can't recall you ever admitting your wrongs, maybe it was you that
made me look normal. :-)

Posting-Frequency: monthly
Last-modified: 2012/07/27
Version: 1.16
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
Skeezix LaRocca
2024-09-08 12:51:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by badgolferman
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
There's TWO things that many alcoholics don't like: 1. Change and 2.
Staying the same.
AA has changed! The singleness of purpose is dead. The Big Book has been
rewritten. Homosexuality is actively promoted. Service work and 12th Step
work are avoided.
Congratulations on “improving” AA…
But Mike, on the bright side, it keeps guys like you, of the tight ass
persuasion engaged in the good fight, albeit a losing one.
--
We all do better when we all do better.

Paul Wellstone
badgolferman
2024-09-08 13:08:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeezix LaRocca
Post by badgolferman
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
There's TWO things that many alcoholics don't like: 1. Change and 2.
Staying the same.
AA has changed! The singleness of purpose is dead. The Big Book has been
rewritten. Homosexuality is actively promoted. Service work and 12th Step
work are avoided.
Congratulations on “improving” AA…
But Mike, on the bright side, it keeps guys like you, of the tight ass
persuasion engaged in the good fight, albeit a losing one.
Do you agree or disagree with the examples I provided? Are these changes
better?

Pluted Pup
2024-09-02 18:24:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
Q) Should the Big Book accept advertising?

A) We have to grow or deteriorate.

Q) Should the Big Book have erotic pictures in it?

A) Change we must, we cannot stand still.

Q) Should AA endorse political candidates?

A) It would be temptingly easy to settle down as merely a useful agency;
the status quo can only be for today, never for tomorrow.
Bob
2024-09-02 19:19:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pluted Pup
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
Q) Should the Big Book accept advertising?
A) We have to grow or deteriorate.
Q) Should the Big Book have erotic pictures in it?
A) Change we must, we cannot stand still.
Q) Should AA endorse political candidates?
A) It would be temptingly easy to settle down as merely a useful agency;
the status quo can only be for today, never for tomorrow.
Crikey Pluted. Not hard to see why moderation is anathema to you! :-)
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
Charlie M. 1958
2024-09-04 15:40:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
One man's principle is another man's prejudice.
Bob
2024-09-04 18:12:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Charlie M. 1958
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
One man's principle is another man's prejudice.
OK :-)
Meaning all here are prejudiced against principle! ;-)
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
Sharx335
2024-09-04 18:43:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
Post by Charlie M. 1958
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
One man's principle is another man's prejudice.
OK :-)
Meaning all here are prejudiced against principle! ;-)
"All" means ALL, NO ONE excluded, not even those south of the Equator.
Bob
2024-09-04 18:53:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
Post by Charlie M. 1958
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
One man's principle is another man's prejudice.
OK :-)
Meaning all here are prejudiced against principle! ;-)
"All" means ALL, NO ONE excluded, not even those south of the Equator.
:-)
Having not precluded myself, are you deflecting or projecting, or both? ;-)
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
Bob
2024-09-04 21:58:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
Post by Charlie M. 1958
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
One man's principle is another man's prejudice.
OK :-)
Meaning all here are prejudiced against principle! ;-)
"All" means ALL, NO ONE excluded, not even those south of the Equator.
:-)
Having not precluded myself, are you deflecting or projecting, or both? ;-)
Neither--however you seem oh so sure that it is one of the OTHER 3
options. Are YOU projecting, deflecting, or both? <vbg>
Unsure if you're now assuming or presuming I was sure, I don't care now at
all, either way!
--
Using Free PhoNews on Android
Sharx335
2024-09-04 23:01:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob
Post by Bob
Post by Sharx335
Post by Bob
Post by Charlie M. 1958
Post by Bob
9. Should A.A. Change?
Perhaps our very first realization should be that we can't stand
still. Now that our basic principles seem established, now that
our functioning is fairly effective and widespread, it would be
temptingly easy to settle down as merely one more useful agency
on the world. We could conclude that "AA is fine, just the way it
is." ... We have to grow or deteriorate. For us, the 'status
quo' can only be for today, never for tomorrow. Change we must;
we cannot stand still.
Seems to me there's even opposing conclusions as to what standing still
actually means.
Do those remaining here have predominantly well established recovery, or
well established prejudices - the antithesis of growth?
One man's principle is another man's prejudice.
OK :-)
Meaning all here are prejudiced against principle! ;-)
"All" means ALL, NO ONE excluded, not even those south of the Equator.
:-)
Having not precluded myself, are you deflecting or projecting, or both? ;-)
Neither--however you seem oh so sure that it is one of the OTHER 3
options. Are YOU projecting, deflecting, or both?  <vbg>
Unsure if you're now assuming or presuming I was sure, I don't care now at
all, either way!
If you say so!
Loading...