Discussion:
Birthright citizenship for illegals to be taken away
Add Reply
Fred Exley
2024-11-07 23:09:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
With both houses and a favorable Supreme Court, Donald Trump can do
quite a bit. As for identifying for deportation the existing illegals,
perhaps requiring an armband with a distinctive marker will help.

https://x.com/ChiefTrumpster/status/1854517735482388721
Pluted Pup
2024-11-08 00:18:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Fred Exley
With both houses and a favorable Supreme Court, Donald Trump can do
quite a bit. As for identifying for deportation the existing illegals,
perhaps requiring an armband with a distinctive marker will help.
https://x.com/ChiefTrumpster/status/1854517735482388721
Blow Hard in Chief says a lot of things, rarely worth
mentioning, and not worth watching a video to hear. In my opinion
it's much more important to attack the Immigration Lobby than it
is to "attack immigrants", no matter how much the media says
that The Immigration Lobby Does Not Exist.

Don't you favor mass immigration, just like free trade?

The Immigration Lobby and the Free Trade Lobby are the same people,
and the media is unanimous in it's threats and demands for
such; should make it easier to oppose both.
Sharx335
2024-11-08 00:22:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pluted Pup
Post by Fred Exley
With both houses and a favorable Supreme Court, Donald Trump can do
quite a bit. As for identifying for deportation the existing illegals,
perhaps requiring an armband with a distinctive marker will help.
https://x.com/ChiefTrumpster/status/1854517735482388721
Blow Hard in Chief says a lot of things, rarely worth
mentioning, and not worth watching a video to hear. In my opinion
it's much more important to attack the Immigration Lobby than it
is to "attack immigrants", no matter how much the media says
that The Immigration Lobby Does Not Exist.
Don't you favor mass immigration, just like free trade?
The Immigration Lobby and the Free Trade Lobby are the same people,
and the media is unanimous in it's threats and demands for
such; should make it easier to oppose both.
The Immigration Lobby, i.e. The progressive wing of the Democratic Party
and the mainstream media who support it. Easy peasy.
Pluted Pup
2024-11-08 03:17:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sharx335
Post by Pluted Pup
Post by Fred Exley
With both houses and a favorable Supreme Court, Donald Trump can do
quite a bit. As for identifying for deportation the existing illegals,
perhaps requiring an armband with a distinctive marker will help.
https://x.com/ChiefTrumpster/status/1854517735482388721
Blow Hard in Chief says a lot of things, rarely worth
mentioning, and not worth watching a video to hear. In my opinion
it's much more important to attack the Immigration Lobby than it
is to "attack immigrants", no matter how much the media says
that The Immigration Lobby Does Not Exist.
Don't you favor mass immigration, just like free trade?
The Immigration Lobby and the Free Trade Lobby are the same people,
and the media is unanimous in it's threats and demands for
such; should make it easier to oppose both.
The Immigration Lobby, i.e. The progressive wing of the Democratic Party
and the mainstream media who support it. Easy peasy.
'The Democratic Party is the party of Free Trade' -- The
Democratic National Committee.

As far as I can guess, the Council Of Foreign Relations is a
militant pressure group that for generations has required it's
members to demandmass Immigration, legal and illegal, and
Free Trade in the USA and all Western countries. They don't
call themselves "Progressives", but their ideal economic
governance is monopolies enforced by Transnational
Corporations, and the "Left" also explicitly demands monopoly
industry.

This looks like a rouges gallery to me:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_Council_on_Foreign_Relations

Leftists will say it is a useless list because it includes
Rupert Murdoch in it and the Left has frequently lied this
whole century saying that Murdoch's Fox News and AT&T's CNN are
Diametrical Opposites andEnclose The Complete Range Of Political
Thought: there is noroom in such a slogan to defend opposition
media, the media thatdoesn't exist yet because competition has been
suppressed by the gangster tactics of monopoly media.

Loading...