undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in state-supported home loans

[badgolferman]

Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.

————-

Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.

However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

[Bob]

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

[badgolferman]

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

This is not usury. This is essentially a giveaway. The government
guarantees the loan so they will forgive it just like they’re doing with
student loans.

As for restitution, we’re already giving the world to illegal immigrants
and every other minority. Our multiple breed president will sign an
executive order which won’t be repealed until a new president comes in, and
by then it will be too late because the cat will be out of the bag.

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

This is not usury. This is essentially a giveaway. The government
guarantees the loan so they will forgive it just like they’re doing with
student loans.
As for restitution, we’re already giving the world to illegal immigrants
and every other minority. Our multiple breed president will sign an
executive order which won’t be repealed until a new president comes in, and
by then it will be too late because the cat will be out of the bag.

Unfortunately, some of my investments are negatively affected by the
economically unenlightened in the Democratic party. More's the pity.

[CW]

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

[Sharx335]

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from having
drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

[Ted H]

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds" in
the first place? It's typically used in reference to animals.

[Sharx335]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds" in
the first place? It's typically used in reference to animals.

Ms Harris and her supporters continually trot her ethnicity as an
attribute. Put down that Kool-Aid And stop trying to be the Word Police
in ARAA.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with, likely a
critical determiner of the coming election, so absolutely necessary.

Post by Ted H

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds" in
the first place? It's typically used in reference to animals.
--
Ted H.

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree.  Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with, likely a
critical determiner of the coming election, so absolutely necessary.

Post by Ted H

 It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from  having
drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred?  And why are we even talking "breeds" in the
first place?  It's typically used in reference to animals.
--
Ted H.

Rest assured, Bob, just because a candidate is Irish or English (my
background) means dick all when it comes to who to vote for.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree.  Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with, likely a
critical determiner of the coming election, so absolutely necessary.

Post by Ted H

 It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from  having
drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred?  And why are we even talking "breeds" in the
first place?  It's typically used in reference to animals.
--
Ted H.

Rest assured, Bob, just because a candidate is Irish or English (my
background) means dick all when it comes to who to vote for.

Thanks for your concern, Dave, but rest assured I'll rest assured be it
Harris or Trump who becomes Polariser In Chief. ;-)

[Ted H]

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.
--
Ted H.

Respectfully, your assumption is incorrect.
Background may help.
In Australia, the most common word was caste, eg.half caste, quarter caste,
three quarter caste, and I do recall even more precise descriptors,and
probably even more precise are probably soon to come

In my casual observation, caste was equally described as breed.
In the News corp bubble I'm currently in, there's a raging debate pertaining
to half breeds, and less, claiming and getting previously unimaginable
powers, based on race.
Those powers include stopping a farmer replacing a crumbling creek crossing
to his farm, and in the last few days one lady completely unknown
(according to local tribal spokespersons) stopping development of a new
mine. The emotional impact is enormous.

Sorry that took so much space.

Now, to the US elections and this thread.
France24 tv just did a short doco special on the Indian diaspora,
particularly in the USA.

They didn't say as much, but I, rightly or wrongly, concluded that the huge
expat Indian vote would be a gigantic asset to Hariss, nothing to do with
breed, simply race.
On seeing her African claims too, nothing whatsoever to do with breed, but
everything to do with race, I concluded that if Haris keeps her mouth shut,
she won't lose in November election.

Hope that's clarified things.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.
--
Ted H.

FWIW
I had wrongly thought we had the biggest little India here.
When I finished replies to you, this was showing on my tv (God did it ;-)

"Rohan Hora asked: Kamala Harris has just become the first Asian American
and African American woman to lead a presidential ticket in US history. For
me as an Indian person this is a massive milestone. What do you think is
the significance of being able to see yourself in your political leaders?"

https://www.abc.net.au/qanda/ep15-26082024/104246534#:~:text=Rohan%20Hora%20asked%3A%20Kamala%20Harris%20has%20just%20become%20the%20first%20Asian%20American%20and%20African%20American%20woman%20to%20lead%20a%20presidential%20ticket%20in%20US%20history.%20For%20me%20as%20an%20Indian%20person%20this%20is%20a%20massive%20milestone.%20What%20do%20you%20think%20is%20the%20significance%20of%20being%20able%20to%20see%20yourself%20in%20your%20political%20leaders%3F

[badgolferman]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

Some of us are not as well spoken as you and CW. You know exactly what I
was trying to say. If you’re going to be a speech police then apply the
same standards to your lefty friends when they demonize and dehumanize
conservatives.

[Bob]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

Some of us are not as well spoken as you and CW. You know exactly what I
was trying to say. If you’re going to be a speech police then apply the
same standards to your lefty friends when they demonize and dehumanize
conservatives.

Somewhat overwhelmed with irony already, must admit it is funny to see that
defence of your most important, long established position; as Chief of araa
Literacy Police.:-)

[badgolferman]

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

Some of us are not as well spoken as you and CW. You know exactly what I
was trying to say. If you’re going to be a speech police then apply the
same standards to your lefty friends when they demonize and dehumanize
conservatives.

Somewhat overwhelmed with irony already, must admit it is funny to see that
defence of your most important, long established position; as Chief of araa
Literacy Police.:-)

I can spell English, not speak woke though.

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

Some of us are not as well spoken as you and CW. You know exactly what I
was trying to say. If you’re going to be a speech police then apply the
same standards to your lefty friends when they demonize and dehumanize
conservatives.

Somewhat overwhelmed with irony already, must admit it is funny to see that
defence of your most important, long established position; as Chief of araa
Literacy Police.:-)

I can spell English, not speak woke though.

Hmm. You might have to learn it after this November. Quel Horreur!

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree.  Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so absolutely
necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less derogatory
term.  As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used wrt animals,
less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity" for native
americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds" and
"mulattos").  Not to mention "quadroons" and various other constructs
developed by those fixated on maintaining white supremacy.  It's
demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore unnecessary.

Some of us are not as well spoken as you and CW. You know exactly what I
was trying to say. If you’re going to be a speech police then apply the
same standards to your lefty friends when they demonize and dehumanize
conservatives.

Somewhat overwhelmed with irony already, must admit it is funny to see that
defence of your most important, long established position; as Chief of araa
Literacy Police.:-)

He gives his opinions. As do you. As do I.

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

Some of us are not as well spoken as you and CW. You know exactly what I
was trying to say. If you’re going to be a speech police then apply the
same standards to your lefty friends when they demonize and dehumanize
conservatives.

Well said! It was the lefties who invented "cancel culture". They
continue to attempt to suppress all narratives save their own. Much of
main stream media is complicit in this.

[Sharx335]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:03:41 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Given peoples proclivity to support a race they identify with,
likely a critical determiner of the coming election, so
absolutely necessary.

You conveniently switched from "breed" to ""race," a less
derogatory term. As I said elsethread, "breed" is most often used
wrt animals, less commonly regarding various degrees of "purity"
for native americans and african americans (e.g., "half breeds"
and "mulattos"). Not to mention "quadroons" and various other
constructs developed by those fixated on maintaining white
supremacy. It's demeaning and de-humanizing, and therefore
unnecessary.

By focusing on details, you're attempting to be diversionary.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds" in
the first place? It's typically used in reference to animals.
--
Ted H.

Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their 'superiority'
they'd separated humanity from the animal genre, so pertaining to humanity
those words became temporarily taboo. Now, it's the Woke who are temporary,
before their time.

[Ted H]

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds"
in the first place? It's typically used in reference to
animals.

Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their
'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal genre,
so pertaining to humanity those words became temporarily taboo.

I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory. Maybe not caste so much.

And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job of
separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use of
"spew." It's the type of charged language I usually try to avoid.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds"
in the first place? It's typically used in reference to
animals.

Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their
'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal genre,
so pertaining to humanity those words became temporarily taboo.

I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory. Maybe not caste so much.

Hope I've already explained the taboo aspect here
Must add I don't see it, but it's possible I've unfairly judged USA Woke.

Post by Ted H
And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job of
separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use of
"spew." It's the type of charged language I usually try to avoid.
--
Ted H.

Had I not believed you do a reasonable job separating intellect from emotion
I would never have responded as I did, although on foul language it's
possible we're ln complete disagreement.

[Ted H]

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:58:40 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside
from having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking
"breeds" in the first place? It's typically used in
reference to animals.

Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their
'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal
genre, so pertaining to humanity those words became
temporarily taboo.

I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory. Maybe not caste so much.

Hope I've already explained the taboo aspect here Must add I
don't see it, but it's possible I've unfairly judged USA Woke.

Yeah, your explanation was helful, thanks. I learned a bit more,
plus realize I'd been largely focused on the U.S. situation.

Post by Ted H
And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job
of separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use
of "spew." It's the type of charged language I usually try to
avoid.

Had I not believed you do a reasonable job separating intellect
from emotion I would never have responded as I did, although on
foul language it's possible we're ln complete disagreement.

Okay, thanks. And I'm not opposed to foul language, and use it
myself from time to time--just try to avoid terms that are more
for attack than for adding clarity. Not always successful.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:58:40 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside
from having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking
"breeds" in the first place? It's typically used in
reference to animals.

Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their
'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal
genre, so pertaining to humanity those words became
temporarily taboo.

I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory. Maybe not caste so much.

Hope I've already explained the taboo aspect here Must add I
don't see it, but it's possible I've unfairly judged USA Woke.

Yeah, your explanation was helful, thanks. I learned a bit more,
plus realize I'd been largely focused on the U.S. situation.

Post by Ted H
And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job
of separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use
of "spew." It's the type of charged language I usually try to
avoid.

Had I not believed you do a reasonable job separating intellect
from emotion I would never have responded as I did, although on
foul language it's possible we're ln complete disagreement.

Okay, thanks. And I'm not opposed to foul language, and use it
myself from time to time--just try to avoid terms that are more
for attack than for adding clarity. Not always successful.
--
Ted H.

Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument here to the
contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone quitting
araa.

[badgolferman]

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument here to the
contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone quitting
araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument here to the
contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone quitting
araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument here to the
contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone quitting
araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

Familiar with both tedw's Jesus and Mike, I can comfortably paraphrase, "If
it were so, Mike would have certainly told us!" :-)

[badgolferman]

Post by Sharx335

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument
here to the contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause
of anyone quitting araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

Do you remember when I tried to lure some of our Google Groupers back?

[Bob]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Sharx335

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument
here to the contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause
of anyone quitting araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

Do you remember when I tried to lure some of our Google Groupers back?

You're an idle gossip who is so far up yourself that your "fairly certain"
absolutely and unconditionally precludes yourself.

Funny thing is that when your God revealed to us how storming off in a snit
should be done, if Rob was posting honestly he was happy to see you go, but
I stood up for you. IIRC, that was before Google dropped Usenet, so your
very own infantile snit remains on public record. :-)

[badgolferman]

Post by Bob
You're an idle gossip who is so far up yourself that your "fairly
certain" absolutely and unconditionally precludes yourself.
Funny thing is that when your God revealed to us how storming off in
a snit should be done, if Rob was posting honestly he was happy to
see you go, but I stood up for you. IIRC, that was before Google
dropped Usenet, so your very own infantile snit remains on public
record.

Welcome back Bob. I was wondering who that normal guy was the past
couple days.

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman

Post by Sharx335

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument
here to the contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause
of anyone quitting araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

Do you remember when I tried to lure some of our Google Groupers back?

You're an idle gossip who is so far up yourself that your "fairly certain"
absolutely and unconditionally precludes yourself.
Funny thing is that when your God revealed to us how storming off in a snit
should be done, if Rob was posting honestly he was happy to see you go, but
I stood up for you. IIRC, that was before Google dropped Usenet, so your
very own infantile snit remains on public record. :-)

What snit? I remember no snit. One person's snit is another persons
logical statement of fact.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman

Post by Sharx335

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument
here to the contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause
of anyone quitting araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

Do you remember when I tried to lure some of our Google Groupers back?

You're an idle gossip who is so far up yourself that your "fairly certain"
absolutely and unconditionally precludes yourself.
Funny thing is that when your God revealed to us how storming off in a snit
should be done, if Rob was posting honestly he was happy to see you go, but
I stood up for you. IIRC, that was before Google dropped Usenet, so your
very own infantile snit remains on public record. :-)

What snit? I remember no snit. One person's snit is another persons
logical statement of fact.

Given you introduced the word snit to this very thread, I'm not at all
surprised you're he one seeking enlightenment.

To answer your question, if you can't go figure, simply try the old
fashioned way and go read what you wrote. ;-)

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Sharx335

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob
Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument
here to the contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause
of anyone quitting araa.

I’m fairly certain that’s already happened.

Who do you think who has stormed off in a snit?

Do you remember when I tried to lure some of our Google Groupers back?

Not specifically. You mean offering to teach them how to use infernal
september?

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:58:40 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree.  Unnecessary.

  It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside >> >>

from having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

Post by Ted H

Post by Ted H
oh, so you're a purebred?  And why are we even talking >>

"breeds" in the first place?  It's typically used in >> >reference

to animals.

Post by Ted H

  Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their >>

'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal >>  genre, so
pertaining to humanity those words became >>  temporarily taboo.

Post by Ted H
I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory.  Maybe not caste so much.

 Hope I've already explained the taboo aspect here Must add I  don't
see it, but it's possible I've unfairly judged USA Woke.

Yeah, your explanation was helful, thanks.  I learned a bit more, plus
realize I'd been largely focused on the U.S. situation.

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job >of

separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use >of
"spew."  It's the type of charged language I usually try to >avoid.
 Had I not believed you do a reasonable job separating intellect
 from emotion I would never have responded as I did, although on
 foul language it's possible we're ln complete disagreement.

Okay, thanks.  And I'm not opposed to foul language, and use it myself
from time to time--just try to avoid terms that are more for attack
than for adding clarity.  Not always successful.
--
Ted H.

Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument here to the
contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone quitting
araa.

If ANYONE chooses to quite ARAA, it is THEIR decision. Nothing I can do
can force anyone to do anything. Blaming someone else for THEIR OWN
decision is just plain lame.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:58:40 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree.  Unnecessary.

  It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside >> >>

from having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

Post by Ted H

Post by Ted H
oh, so you're a purebred?  And why are we even talking >>

"breeds" in the first place?  It's typically used in >> >reference

to animals.

Post by Ted H

  Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their >>

'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal >>  genre, so
pertaining to humanity those words became >>  temporarily taboo.

Post by Ted H
I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory.  Maybe not caste so much.

 Hope I've already explained the taboo aspect here Must add I  don't
see it, but it's possible I've unfairly judged USA Woke.

Yeah, your explanation was helful, thanks.  I learned a bit more, plus
realize I'd been largely focused on the U.S. situation.

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job >of

separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use >of
"spew."  It's the type of charged language I usually try to >avoid.
 Had I not believed you do a reasonable job separating intellect
 from emotion I would never have responded as I did, although on
 foul language it's possible we're ln complete disagreement.

Okay, thanks.  And I'm not opposed to foul language, and use it myself
from time to time--just try to avoid terms that are more for attack
than for adding clarity.  Not always successful.
--
Ted H.

Thanks for your response. Despite possible evidence and argument here to the
contrary, I most certainly don't want to be the cause of anyone quitting
araa.

If ANYONE chooses to quite ARAA, it is THEIR decision. Nothing I can do
can force anyone to do anything. Blaming someone else for THEIR OWN
decision is just plain lame.

Did it hurt you very much shouting that other people can't be forced to
quit araa?
Did their freedom, or your shouting, hurt most?
How dare people simply choose whom they'll associate with online, let alone
with what technology, whatsmore! :-(

[Sharx335]

Post by Ted H
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:13:43 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds"
in the first place? It's typically used in reference to
animals.

Breed or caste, Woke hypocrites imagined because of their
'superiority' they'd separated humanity from the animal genre,
so pertaining to humanity those words became temporarily taboo.

I don't think many want those terms to be taboo, rather the
interest is in clarifying that they have meanings that are
derogatory. Maybe not caste so much.
And regarding your other comment, I think I do a reasonable job of
separating emotion from reason, though I do regret the use of
"spew." It's the type of charged language I usually try to avoid.

Ted, believe I, too, know, in the moment of the heat of the debate, how
difficult it can be to avoid "colourful" language. But, in the coolness
of time, I have to admit that it seldom does more than inflame the
discourse.

[Pluted Pup]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

It was necessary to include that wording, otherwise
you'd have nothing to complain about.

Post by Ted H

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds" in
the first place? It's typically used in reference to animals.

[Ted H]

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:54:08 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds"
in the first place? It's typically used in reference to
animals.

Just wanted to add that "breeding" was commonplace (often forced)
in chattel slavery as a way to increase wealth of the enslaver.
So that's a good reason for considerate people not to use the term
wrt human beings.

-
Ted H.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:54:08 -0000 (UTC),

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:39:57 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

Agree. Unnecessary.

Post by Sharx335
It is a factual statement. What is YOUR problem...aside from
having drunk the Harris Kool-Aid?

oh, so you're a purebred? And why are we even talking "breeds"
in the first place? It's typically used in reference to
animals.

Just wanted to add that "breeding" was commonplace (often forced)
in chattel slavery as a way to increase wealth of the enslaver.
So that's a good reason for considerate people not to use the term
wrt human beings.
-
Ted H.

Alternatively, narcissism inherent in Judeo-Christian theology regarded
humans as being superior to animals, slaves merely a measure of righteous
wealth.

No point, other than the deceit of diplomacy, in showing respect for an
arguably false sense of superiority over other animals.

What negated that particular bullshit in me was firstly, serendipitously
examining my own narcissistic belief that fish could feel no pain merely
because I couldn't recognise expression in their eyes; then recently,
learning the reality that wild elephants have funerals, and remain aware of
the location of the graves.

[Socrates]

Post by Bob

Just wanted to add that "breeding" was commonplace (often forced) in
chattel slavery as a way to increase wealth of the enslaver. So that's
a good reason for considerate people not to use the term wrt human
beings.

Alternatively, narcissism inherent in Judeo-Christian theology regarded
humans as being superior to animals, slaves merely a measure of righteous
wealth.
No point, other than the deceit of diplomacy, in showing respect for an
arguably false sense of superiority over other animals.
What negated that particular bullshit in me was firstly, serendipitously
examining my own narcissistic belief that fish could feel no pain merely
because I couldn't recognise expression in their eyes; then recently,
learning the reality that wild elephants have funerals, and remain aware of
the location of the graves.

Turns out Homo sapiens are not the only "primarily emotional" creatures
on this planet.

[Bob]

Post by Socrates

Post by Bob

Just wanted to add that "breeding" was commonplace (often forced) in
chattel slavery as a way to increase wealth of the enslaver. So that's
a good reason for considerate people not to use the term wrt human
beings.

Alternatively, narcissism inherent in Judeo-Christian theology regarded
humans as being superior to animals, slaves merely a measure of righteous
wealth.
No point, other than the deceit of diplomacy, in showing respect for an
arguably false sense of superiority over other animals.
What negated that particular bullshit in me was firstly, serendipitously
examining my own narcissistic belief that fish could feel no pain merely
because I couldn't recognise expression in their eyes; then recently,
learning the reality that wild elephants have funerals, and remain aware of
the location of the graves.

Turns out Homo sapiens are not the only "primarily emotional" creatures
on this planet.

How do you know that most elephants aren't primarily emotionally balanced
with intellect, while most humans are, pertaining even to our own good,
inferior animals?

[Socrates]

Post by Bob

Post by Socrates

Post by Bob

Just wanted to add that "breeding" was commonplace (often forced) in
chattel slavery as a way to increase wealth of the enslaver. So
that's a good reason for considerate people not to use the term wrt
human beings.

Alternatively, narcissism inherent in Judeo-Christian theology regarded
humans as being superior to animals, slaves merely a measure of righteous
wealth.
No point, other than the deceit of diplomacy, in showing respect for an
arguably false sense of superiority over other animals.
What negated that particular bullshit in me was firstly, serendipitously
examining my own narcissistic belief that fish could feel no pain merely
because I couldn't recognise expression in their eyes; then recently,
learning the reality that wild elephants have funerals, and remain aware of
the location of the graves.

Turns out Homo sapiens are not the only "primarily emotional"
creatures on this planet.

How do you know that most elephants aren't primarily emotionally balanced
with intellect, while most humans are, pertaining even to our own good,
inferior animals?

Now that you mention it.........

[CW]

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

[Sharx335]

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC. Multiple-breed is synonymous with having
more than one ethnic root. It is YOU who has lowered the conversation
but what else can the woke do when they don't have any basis for their
blather? We saw and heard it multiple times during the DNC.

[CW]

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having
more than one ethnic root. It is YOU who has lowered the conversation
but what else can the woke do when they don't have any basis for their
blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

Post by Sharx335
We saw and heard it multiple times during the DNC.

DDS, much?

[Sharx335]

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

Or not.

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335
We saw and heard it multiple times during the DNC.

DDS, much?

[Ted H]

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

Or not.

Hopeless. As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.

[Bob]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

Or not.

Hopeless. As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.
--
Ted H.

A shame Ted will probably never read this. I believe it rare for persons
such as Ted, in western societies; to discriminate between emotions and
intelligence as societies polarise to the point of no return, and civil
wars, yet again.

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement. >>>

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC. > > Really?

Post by CW
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic

root. It >> is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can
the woke do >> when they don't have any basis for their blather? > >
Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?
 Or not.

Hopeless.  As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.
--
Ted H.

A shame Ted will probably never read this. I believe it rare for persons
such as Ted, in western societies; to discriminate between emotions and
intelligence as societies polarise to the point of no return, and civil
wars, yet again.

It seems, to me, a non-U.S. observer, that polarization is spread
equally across the political spectrum, both in the U.S. and here in Canada.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement. >>>

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC. > > Really?

Post by CW
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic

root. It >> is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can
the woke do >> when they don't have any basis for their blather? > >
Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?
 Or not.

Hopeless.  As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.
--
Ted H.

A shame Ted will probably never read this. I believe it rare for persons
such as Ted, in western societies; to discriminate between emotions and
intelligence as societies polarise to the point of no return, and civil
wars, yet again.

It seems, to me, a non-U.S. observer, that polarization is spread
equally across the political spectrum, both in the U.S. and here in Canada.

Glad I can glean enough information from German TV and France24 to conclude
polarity is Global from Shanghai to London, and in between too.

[Pluted Pup]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement. >>>

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC. > > Really?

Post by CW
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic

root. It >> is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can
the woke do >> when they don't have any basis for their blather? > >
Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?
Or not.

Hopeless. As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.
--
Ted H.

A shame Ted will probably never read this. I believe it rare for persons
such as Ted, in western societies; to discriminate between emotions and
intelligence as societies polarise to the point of no return, and civil
wars, yet again.

It seems, to me, a non-U.S. observer, that polarization is spread
equally across the political spectrum, both in the U.S. and here in Canada.

The *media* is the polarizer in chief. American media is dedicated
to making the world ignorant about America and the Canadian media
is dedicated to making the world ignorant about Canada.

The media is *balanced* all right, it tells you who to
blindly hate and who to blindly praise!

[Bob]

Post by Pluted Pup

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement. >>>

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC. > > Really?

Post by CW
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic

root. It >> is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can
the woke do >> when they don't have any basis for their blather? > >
Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?
Or not.

Hopeless. As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.
--
Ted H.

A shame Ted will probably never read this. I believe it rare for persons
such as Ted, in western societies; to discriminate between emotions and
intelligence as societies polarise to the point of no return, and civil
wars, yet again.

It seems, to me, a non-U.S. observer, that polarization is spread
equally across the political spectrum, both in the U.S. and here in Canada.

The *media* is the polarizer in chief. American media is dedicated
to making the world ignorant about America and the Canadian media
is dedicated to making the world ignorant about Canada.
The media is *balanced* all right, it tells you who to
blindly hate and who to blindly praise!

Thanks be to Festivus that you're a cut above the rest, and blindly hate
whomever you like! :-)

[Sharx335]

Post by Pluted Pup

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement. >>>

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC. > > Really?

Post by CW
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic

root. It >> is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can
the woke do >> when they don't have any basis for their blather? > >
Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?
Or not.

Hopeless. As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.
--
Ted H.

A shame Ted will probably never read this. I believe it rare for persons
such as Ted, in western societies; to discriminate between emotions and
intelligence as societies polarise to the point of no return, and civil
wars, yet again.

It seems, to me, a non-U.S. observer, that polarization is spread
equally across the political spectrum, both in the U.S. and here in Canada.

The *media* is the polarizer in chief. American media is dedicated
to making the world ignorant about America and the Canadian media
is dedicated to making the world ignorant about Canada.
The media is *balanced* all right, it tells you who to
blindly hate and who to blindly praise!

I have to start with my own thinking.

[Sharx335]

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

Or not.

Hopeless. As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.

It's YOUR woke Kool-Aid induced spew that *I* shouldn't engage with, Ted.

[Ken P]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

  Or not.

Hopeless.  As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.

It's YOUR woke Kool-Aid induced spew that *I* shouldn't engage with, Ted.

Good night all.

[Sharx335]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

  Or not.

Hopeless.  As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.

It's YOUR woke Kool-Aid induced spew that *I* shouldn't engage with, Ted.

 Good night all.

I just stated my *opinion*...I did not claim it to be a "truth", like
the cancel-culture woke types so often do. It is recommended that one
have a "thick skin" when on social media. If not, best to go back to a
"safe place", e.g. a playground sand box.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

  Or not.

Hopeless.  As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.

It's YOUR woke Kool-Aid induced spew that *I* shouldn't engage with, Ted.

 Good night all.

I just stated my *opinion*...I did not claim it to be a "truth", like
the cancel-culture woke types so often do. It is recommended that one
have a "thick skin" when on social media. If not, best to go back to a
"safe place", e.g. a playground sand box.

At least you've finally told us the truth of where *your* safe place is! :-)

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Sharx335

Post by Ted H
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:14:52 -0600,

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

Apples and oranges ILLOGIC.

Really?

Post by Sharx335
Multiple-breed is synonymous with having more than one ethnic root. It
is YOU who has lowered the conversation but what else can the woke do
when they don't have any basis for their blather?

Un-clutch your fucking pearls, Dave. Is what I said a *fact* or not?

  Or not.

Hopeless.  As if I needed a reminder not to engage with this spew.

It's YOUR woke Kool-Aid induced spew that *I* shouldn't engage with, Ted.

  Good night all.

I just stated my *opinion*...I did not claim it to be a "truth", like
the cancel-culture woke types so often do.  It is recommended that one
have a "thick skin" when on social media. If not, best to go back to a
"safe place", e.g. a playground sand box.

At least you've finally told us the truth of where *your* safe place is! :-)

It SAF would not be Australia with its collective DNA heavily debased by
transported criminals.

[Bob]

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

HaHa
You just did, so I have to agree with both of you. :-)

[Pluted Pup]

Post by Bob

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

HaHa
You just did, so I have to agree with both of you. :-)

Why do you call him "Mike" when he doesn't call
himself that?

And is it true that badgolferman is what Jews
call muslims?

[Bob]

Post by Pluted Pup

Post by Bob

Post by CW

Post by Sharx335

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

It is a factual statement.

And some might call Mike half a sand-nigger.

HaHa
You just did, so I have to agree with both of you. :-)

Why do you call him "Mike" when he doesn't call
himself that?

Because that's what I choose to call him, plus Mike takes less vision and
concentration to type. :-)

Post by Pluted Pup
And is it true that badgolferman is what Jews
call muslims?

Are you resigning as our fountain of truth here?
No point in asking me!

[Bob]

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

At least, unlike Woke hypocrites, he's open about the racism inherent in
humanity from the start.

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

At least, unlike Woke hypocrites, he's open about the racism inherent in
humanity from the start.

Tribalism, rightly or wrongly, is part of the evolved human psyche.

[Pluted Pup]

Post by Bob

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

At least, unlike Woke hypocrites, he's open about the racism inherent in
humanity from the start.

The "Woke" make more death threats and racial violence
than anyone else, and they are praised by authority for it.

[badgolferman]

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

I’m multiple breed myself. So what?

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman

Post by CW

Post by badgolferman
Our multiple breed president

Really, Mike?

I’m multiple breed myself. So what?

Likewise. I'm half English and half Irish and I don't celebrate the
culture of either group. I've never been to either England or Ireland
and, even though I could well afford to gallivant, I have absolutely NO
desire to go to either place.

[Bob]

Post by badgolferman

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

This is not usury. This is essentially a giveaway. The government
guarantees the loan so they will forgive it just like they’re doing with
student loans.

There happens to be a difference between a government loan of treasury money
that proves your assertion absurd. A government guarantee to a mortgagor
guarantees the Hebrew tradition of ursary.

Post by badgolferman
As for restitution, we’re already giving the world to illegal immigrants
and every other minority. Our multiple breed president will sign an
executive order which won’t be repealed until a new president comes in, and
by then it will be too late because the cat will be out of the bag.

If you say so. ....,.

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state
residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-
loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

Let the guilty pay the restitution. I am SAF NOT responsible for that my
grandfather did.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-
loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

Let the guilty pay the restitution. I am SAF NOT responsible for that my
grandfather did.

Interesting fact about Judao/Christianity from which AA's stepa emanated is
that were someone you had harmed die before you made amends, those amends
*must* in some way be made to the estate of the person you have harmed.

What interested me was the entire motive of AA's steps seemed to be about
eliminating guilt from the stepper; so don't really give a shit about the
person who was harmed, as what happened when I took the steps.

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-
loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

Let the guilty pay the restitution. I am SAF NOT responsible for that
my grandfather did.

Interesting fact about Judao/Christianity from which AA's stepa emanated is
that were someone you had harmed die before you made amends, those amends
*must* in some way be made to the estate of the person you have harmed.
What interested me was the entire motive of AA's steps seemed to be about
eliminating guilt from the stepper; so don't really give a shit about the
person who was harmed, as what happened when I took the steps.

*I* am not responsible for righting wrongs committed by OTHER people.
YOU want to assume THEIR guilt, use YOUR money and time, NOT mine.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-
loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

Let the guilty pay the restitution. I am SAF NOT responsible for that
my grandfather did.

Interesting fact about Judao/Christianity from which AA's stepa emanated is
that were someone you had harmed die before you made amends, those amends
*must* in some way be made to the estate of the person you have harmed.
What interested me was the entire motive of AA's steps seemed to be about
eliminating guilt from the stepper; so don't really give a shit about the
person who was harmed, as what happened when I took the steps.

*I* am not responsible for righting wrongs committed by OTHER people.
YOU want to assume THEIR guilt, use YOUR money and time, NOT mine.

Amusing that your notorious knee jerking prevented you from noticing that
guilt was only in context of AA affairs, as distinct from the affairs
of.another country. :-)

[Sharx335]

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-
loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

Let the guilty pay the restitution. I am SAF NOT responsible for
that my grandfather did.

Interesting fact about Judao/Christianity from which AA's stepa emanated is
that were someone you had harmed die before you made amends, those amends
*must* in some way be made to the estate of the person you have harmed.
What interested me was the entire motive of AA's steps seemed to be about
eliminating guilt from the stepper; so don't really give a shit about the
person who was harmed, as what happened when I took the steps.

*I* am not responsible for righting wrongs committed by OTHER people.
YOU want to assume THEIR guilt, use YOUR money and time, NOT mine.

Amusing that your notorious knee jerking prevented you from noticing that
guilt was only in context of AA affairs, as distinct from the affairs
of.another country. :-)

Guilt in either AA affairs or in other country's affairs. I didn't cause
it and I can't cure it. Therefore I have no guilt to deal with.

[Bob]

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by Sharx335

Post by Bob

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-
loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

Same old, same old, but atrocious nonetheless.
The old Hebrew practice of ursary has prevailed since diasporas began.
If those poor innocent immigrants don't keep paying the interest, the entire
family will lose their own home. :-(
Restitution may indeed be claimed, but would it ever be granted?
;-)

Let the guilty pay the restitution. I am SAF NOT responsible for
that my grandfather did.

Interesting fact about Judao/Christianity from which AA's stepa emanated is
that were someone you had harmed die before you made amends, those amends
*must* in some way be made to the estate of the person you have harmed.
What interested me was the entire motive of AA's steps seemed to be about
eliminating guilt from the stepper; so don't really give a shit about the
person who was harmed, as what happened when I took the steps.

*I* am not responsible for righting wrongs committed by OTHER people.
YOU want to assume THEIR guilt, use YOUR money and time, NOT mine.

Amusing that your notorious knee jerking prevented you from noticing that
guilt was only in context of AA affairs, as distinct from the affairs
of.another country. :-)

Guilt in either AA affairs or in other country's affairs. I didn't cause
it and I can't cure it. Therefore I have no guilt to deal with.

Ha Ha
That reminds me of an old South African lady who ran the AA helpline.
If a female phoned for help, she would instantly say, "The first thing you
must do is leave your husband/boyfriend"

When AA office conversation got around to defects of character, she actually
boasted that was the part of the program that didn't apply to her, because
she had no character defects.

Glad I didn't quickly recall her name, lest I had demonstrated a character
defect and doxed her. ;-)

[Sharx335]

Post by badgolferman
Prepare for more of the country and your money given away to illegal aliens
when Harris is president. And of course reparations will come to the
forefront.
————-
Lawmakers in California could soon make the Golden State the first in the
country to make undocumented immigrants eligible for up to $150,000 in
state-supported home loans.
However, Democratic lawmakers in the state have defended the legislation,
arguing that it is simply designed to give undocumented state residents the
same benefits afforded to everyone else in the state.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-close-approving-150k-loans-illegal-immigrants-help-purchase-homes

WTF should illegals who, instead should have their collective arses
shipped south, are treated as privileged LEGAL citizens? Surely the
inmates have taken over the asylum. And, more and more, Kalifornistan is
going crazy. Little wonder why it is losing population to more sane states.